CEO's welcomeGood afternoon and thank you for joining us today. The topic for today is safeguarding. Safeguarding as a general concept is to protect people from harm and abuse, both verbally and physically. The best way is to put appropriate measures in place. This often means a framework, which allows those involved to follow prescribed steps to prevent negative outcomes. Safeguarding is never the responsibility of just one or two people, it is a principle that everyone must follow if they come into contact with vulnerable people – both children and adults. All organisations have to ensure that they prioritise the safety of anyone who comes into contact with their organisation. Safeguarding is particularly relevant to local authorities, charities and care organisations who work directly with children or adults at risk. Today, we will seek to gain a better understanding from a subject matter expert. |
Chair's opening commentsEvery so often we hear accounts in the media of distressing cases, whether they involve grooming gangs, modern slavery, elderly or vulnerable adults, or sadly as we have heard in recent weeks children and babies. Along with the inevitable anger, questions always follow these cases regarding why they were not identified sooner, who was responsible, and what more could have been done. Local authorities have a statutory responsibility for safeguarding, promoting wellbeing within local communities and cooperating with partners to protect adults at risk of abuse or neglect. Local authorities have wider safeguarding duties under the Care Act 2014, including: leading a multi-agency local adult safeguarding system; establish Safeguarding Adults Boards; making enquiries when they think an adult with care and support needs may be at risk of abuse or neglect; and carrying out safeguarding adults reviews when someone with care and support needs dies as a result of neglect or abuse. Let’s hear what Stephen Watson, Chair of the Northumberland County Council Audit Committee, has to say on this challenging topic. |
Slides from Stephen’s presentation are available here. Stephen also emphasised some key points:
Chair's closing commentsThe Victoria Climbie murder case has stuck with me. As is often the case, there were lots of people who were aware of relevant pieces of information, but no one put the jigsaw together of a child being abused. So what can internal audit do in this area? I agree with Stephen that it is appropriate for us to work around the margins, rather than second guess expert decisions. This has made me think of a couple of areas that we could consider: HR – Are the proper background checks being carried out? Do we know all of our officers who are coming into contact with vulnerable people? Procurement – Have the risks of contractors acting on behalf of the council visiting properties of vulnerable people been considered? Maybe during procurement organisations should be checking the policies and training of third parties. I’m sure there are many others. |
Institute's closing commentsWe are currently finalising our programme of sessions and topics for the first half of 2022. Our January session (date to be confirmed) will likely focus on cash flow management – staving off a Section 114 notice. The Audit & Risk Awards recognises the high standards of quality and integrity vital to the success of internal audit, as well as reward the innovation delivered by teams and individuals who are at the cutting-edge of their profession. Nominations for the Audit & Risk Awards are now open, submit your entry by 16 February 2022, ready for the award ceremony on 29 June 2022. Thank you everyone, have a wonderful festive break and see you in 2022. |
Q: Would you expect council internal auditors to have safeguarding training in their toolkit and DBS clearances?
A: I would say that training is now necessary, whereas I may not have said so five years ago. Training not only for internal auditors and their professional dealings, but also training around understanding challenges faced by managers in safeguarding. I would encourage DBS checks for auditors who may audit schools or social care, while being mindful of a legal basis of doing so for that role.
Q: My concern is that because I am not a social care practitioner, internal audit could give a false level of assurance because we cannot check completely whether a referral has been investigated appropriately. What are your thoughts on this please?
A: Be cautious on where you are providing assurance and that the remit of the audit is clear. Focus on policies and compliance, rather than second guessing practitioner decisions.
Q: Is there any sort of assessment criteria to assess audit roles for the need to have DBS or even police clearance (specific to auditors)?
A: I don’t think there is, it is a decision for individual audit teams.
Q: What should an internal auditor do if they encounter a safeguarding concern during their work?
A: It is important to follow organisational policy. I would generally expect the first port of call to be a line manager, rather than to risk setting hares running unnecessarily, as long as there is no immediate risk of harm.
Q: Is there an opportunity to do data analytics here, considering what data was available to inform decisions by practitioners?
A: Data analytics has to be a key part of this – the more information and outliers we can identify that the organisation cannot identify itself, the more we are adding value.
Chat box comments:
CaerphillyCBCTV | Basic safeguarding training
Gwent Safeguarding | Safeguarding is everybody's responsibility
Gov.uk | DBS eligibility guidance
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)